The Material Reality of Responsible Scale

Sustainable data center growth depends not only on operational efficiency, but also on the material and design choices that shape a facility's environmental footprint from the outset.

The data center industry is at an inflection point. AI workloads are expanding at an extraordinary pace, changing infrastructure requirements, driving increases in rack densities, accelerating the adoption of liquid cooling, and shortening infrastructure refresh cycles. At the same time, the industry faces growing constraints related to power availability, water consumption, and land access, which are reflected in evolving regulatory pressures and heightened public scrutiny. 

For data center owners, a responsible and sustainable approach to scale is critical to navigating these challenges. Many hyperscale operators have established sustainability targets for their data centers, with key metrics such as renewable energy integration, water stewardship, and emissions reductions. Energy efficiency remains particularly important, influencing both operational performance and environmental outcomes as AI-driven demand continues to grow. 

Yet it is becoming increasingly clear that data center operations are only part of the story: how data centers are built can be just as important to sustainability as how they operate.  

From material selection to engineering approach, decisions during the earliest stages of data center design establish the foundation for a facility's long-term environmental footprint. With those decisions come meaningful, and often overlooked, opportunities to advance sustainability.  

 

The Distinction Between Operational and Embodied Carbon

Opportunities to build sustainability into data center construction stem from the distinction between operational carbon, the emissions associated with powering and cooling a data center throughout its lifecycle; and embodied carbon, the emissions associated with the extraction, manufacture, transport, and installation of materials before the facility becomes operational.   

Reducing operational emissions is an ongoing process over a building’s lifetime, with new opportunities arising as efficiency improvements are made, or when renewable energy sources become available. In contrast, a building’s embodied carbon footprint is largely determined before operations begin, with decisions made during design, material specification, and construction contributing a lasting impact on a facility's overall sustainability profile. 

For data center construction, embodied carbon plays an especially important role in overall environmental impact. Data centers are fundamentally material-intensive systems, with every facility constructed from components deployed at massive scale across multiple sites and campuses, compounding any inefficiencies in the construction process. 

As AI-driven computing demand continues to grow, data center infrastructure can quickly become outdated. Higher rack densities and evolving cooling strategies mean that a system designed for today's requirements may be operating under significantly different conditions just a few years later.

When systems cannot adapt, components are often replaced before reaching the end of their useful life, requiring infrastructure to be removed and rebuilt with large quantities of steel, aluminum, polycarbonate, and other materials consumed. With each replacement cycle, costs rise and embodied carbon accumulates, giving design decisions far-reaching operational, financial, and environmental implications.

Designing for Sustainable Outcomes

The pace of change in the data center industry makes long-term forecasting increasingly unreliable. The only constant is change itself, driven by step-change advances in computing technologies and evolving workload demands. As a result, adaptability is emerging as a design principle that is as critical to performance as it is to sustainability. 

By intentionally designing systems that can accommodate future change, engineers can extend the viable lifetime of infrastructure investments and reduce the need for premature replacement. Achieving this requires making design decisions that prioritize adaptability from the earliest stages of project development, when the greatest opportunities to reduce embodied carbon and enhance long-term sustainability are available.

Modular Solutions for Future Growth

At Tate, we see modularity as a critical enabler of long-term adaptability. Our data center infrastructure systems are designed with scalability and flexibility in mind, creating opportunities for future upgrades, replacements, and expansions over time. Through integration-ready solutions designed to scale incrementally, we aim to better accommodate changing operational requirements and evolving facility needs.

One example is PowerStack, a modular infrastructure platform that is intentionally designed for incremental scalability. Capacity can be added as requirements grow, rather than replacing entire assemblies before they have been fully utilized.  

Supporting Long-Term Performance

Looking ahead, building on the concept of modularity is essential to embracing adaptability. This might mean enabling reconfiguration to support increasing density, accommodating advances in liquid cooling without rebuilding surrounding systems, or the ability to integrate future technologies beyond the scope of today's design brief without needing full system replacement. Adaptability could also mean designing for disassembly, so materials can be recovered and reused, supporting circularity through the project lifecycle. When systems can adapt instead of being replaced, replacement cycles are extended. This helps limit repeated material inputs over time, reducing the additional embodied carbon introduced.

Advancing Sustainability Across the Project Team

No single role drives transformation. Instead, an aligned approach across roles, teams, and organizations can lower embodied carbon and enable adaptability, in each data center project. 

Procurement 

  • Require environmental product declarations (EPDs) from suppliers
  • Prioritize lower-embodied carbon steel and materials
  • Engage suppliers on emissions reduction pathways 

Owners & Developers 

  • Set embodied carbon targets early  
  • Establish lifecycle expectations, not just install-day performance 
  • Enable flexibility and reuse in specifications 

Designers 

  • Specify lower embodied carbon materials
  • Consider reconfiguration, recovery, and reuse
  • Reduce material intensity where possible 

 

Tate's Approach: Practical Actions to Increase Sustainability

As the industry evolves toward greater adaptability, alignment across the value chain is essential. However, we do not need to solve every industry and supply chain challenge before we make progress. There are questions we can ask and decisions we can make today that will shape progress and influence the industry’s contribution to total embodied carbon impacts.  

At Tate, our approach to sustainability is built on practical actions to reduce embodied carbon across the products we deliver, through investments in operational sustainability and responsible material selection. The result is a growing portfolio of lower embodied carbon solutions, backed by third-party verified Environmental Product Declarations. 

Building Beyond Today

The constraints facing the data center industry will intensify in the coming years, with energy demand rising, water availability remaining a critical factor, and regulatory pressures continuing to evolve. At the same time, the future state of AI infrastructure remains a moving target, requiring designs that can accommodate change rather than depend on precise forecasts. 

In this environment, adaptability becomes less a design preference and more a strategic necessity. The most durable infrastructure may not be designed around a single vision of the future but instead designed with the capability to adapt as that future takes shape. By building flexibility and capacity for change into infrastructure from the outset, organizations can better navigate evolving technologies, shifting requirements, and emerging constraints while extending asset life and supporting more sustainable outcomes over the long term. 

Explore More

Hear from Kimberlee Glinka, Director of Sustainability, and Sinéad Lalor, Director of Engineering, on the challenges and opportunities of reducing embodied carbon in an era of accelerating AI growth.

Untitled Design (2)